PDF model
Mohammad Meskarpour Amiri 1,2 and Ali Mehrabi Tavana 1
1Health Management Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran. 2Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran. (Correspondence to: Ali Mehrabi Tavana:
This e-mail deal with is being protected against spambots. You want JavaScript enabled to view it
).
Abstract
Background: The common well being insurance policies for the Islamic Republic of Iran have been authorized in April 2014.
Aims: This examine examined the boundaries at present confronted by common well being insurance policies and the mechanisms required for the profitable implementation of those polices.
Methods: This qualitative examine was carried out as a two-phase venture primarily based on customary CAN-IMPLEMENT tips. A set of qualitative strategies, together with face-to-face in-depth interviews, focus teams, and in-person consensus conferences, have been used to make clear mechanisms and boundaries.
Results: Twenty-one mechanisms and 13 boundaries have been recognized. The majority of mechanisms have been associated to the event of well being infrastructures and acceptable allocation of sources. The most vital boundaries to implementation of common well being insurance policies have been lack of formulated methods, poor administration, lack of a complete nationwide motion plan, minimal info infrastructures, and insufficient funding
Conclusions: An intensive understanding of boundaries and mechanisms for implementation of common well being insurance policies can present the mandatory background to make sure profitable well being promotion within the nation.
Keywords: Health coverage, well being methods, well being plan implementation, Iran.
Received: 02/05/17; accepted: 13/11/17
Citation: Meskarpour Amiri M; Mehrabi Tavana A. Successful implementation of common well being insurance policies within the Islamic Republic of Iran: boundaries and mechanisms. East Mediterr Health J. 2018;24(12):1127–1134. https://doi.org/10.26719/emhj.18.009
Copyright © World Health Organization (WHO) 2018. Some rights reserved. This work is obtainable underneath the CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).
Introduction
During the three final many years the well being system within the Islamic Republic of Iran has skilled varied reforms with many alternative challenges and successes. The initially was the institution of the National Health Network in 1983 (1). The National Health Network was progressive in its institution of a main well being care community within the nation, however the benefits have been restricted to the extent of main well being care solely, and the nation’s medical care nonetheless suffered from a poor referral system (2,3). Over the subsequent twenty years, the well being system underwent a number of reforms together with integration of well being provision and medical training, common medical insurance coverage, hospital autonomy, and rural medical insurance (2). In 2005, deficiencies within the National Health Network have been addressed by the Family Physician Programme, which was carried out to enhance the referral system by a gatekeeping mechanism, however regardless of the programme’s achievements it’s nonetheless removed from supreme (4,5).
The newest try and reform the well being system noticed the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MoHME) apply a set of reforms within the well being care system in 2014 titled ‘Health Sector Evolution Plan’. The two primary goals of those reforms have been to cut back direct expenditure for inpatients and enhance the standard of care in governmental hospitals (6). However, the presence of some challenges – together with lack of sustainable financing, neglect of main and preventive well being care, and disrespect for sufferers in personal hospitals – had a damaging impact on the reform (2). Today, the Health Sector Evolution Plan nonetheless faces criticism (7–9).
More than three many years of well being reforms within the Islamic Republic of Iran has proven that there’s a state of chaos on the well being policymaking stage, the place quite a lot of well being reforms weren’t profitable because of the nation’s political upheavals (2,5). To deal with this case, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran authorized the final well being insurance policies for the nation on 7 April, 2014 (10), which outline the ideas and goals of the nation’s well being system (11). These insurance policies embrace implementation mechanisms for quantitative and qualitative improvement of medical insurance and sustainable well being financing, in addition to emphasizing the comprehensiveness of well being and neighborhood contributions to well being promotion. The common well being insurance policies additionally emphasize bettering the standard and security of companies, establishing infrastructures for producing medical merchandise and gear, organizing healthcare demand, conventional drugs, and medical training (11,12).
Despite MoHME’s accountability for policy-making, planning, evaluating, and monitoring of common well being insurance policies, boundaries confronted and mechanisms required for profitable implementation haven’t been correctly specified. Therefore, there are considerations that required adjustments within the well being system haven’t been addressed (11,12). Hence, this examine researched such boundaries and mechanisms for common well being coverage implementation within the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Methods
This qualitative examine was carried out in 2015. It was carried out as a two-phase venture tailored from customary CAN-IMPLEMENT tips (13). Methods included face-to-face in-depth interviews, focus teams, and in-person consensus conferences to outline mechanisms and boundaries. The doc underneath evaluate on this examine was the final well being insurance policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran, issued 7 April, 2014 (10).
Based on the CAN-IMPLEMENT tips (13), a collection of semi-structured in-depth face-to-face interviews have been carried out with well being system directors and top-level planners. These people have been composed of presidents and deputies of medical sciences universities, well being analysis centres, and well being care centres. Each participant acquired a package deal together with the final well being insurance policies doc and a common format of the questions, and have been requested to spotlight essential boundaries and facilitator mechanisms for the implementation of common well being insurance policies. During the interview, snowball sampling was employed to establish further individuals till saturation. All the interviews have been carried out by two skilled interviewers in related fields of examine.
For information evaluation, the thematic evaluation was carried out by the method of a coding framework as reported by Braun et al. (14) and utilized in earlier research (15,16). The framework included six phases: familiarizing with information, producing preliminary codes, trying to find themes amongst codes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and producing the ultimate report (14). Each interview was transcribed instantly after recording. After transcribing all interviews, the researchers reviewed the textual content a number of instances till a common impression was acquired. Then a coding course of was carried out for every interview manually by utilizing fixed comparative strategies (17,18). Thus, all texts have been damaged down into significant items and preliminary codes have been obtained. Codes with comparable meanings have been grouped into subcategories; comparable subcategories have been grouped into primary classes. The credibility of the classes was decided by utilizing frequency of prevalence and consistency talked about by individuals within the interviews. The themes have been mentioned, outlined and refined by analysis members repeatedly till no new themes have been detected.
For the second step of examine, three 90-minute in-person focus teams have been fashioned with the presence of all individuals. These focus teams have been managed and recorded by a professor inside a related analysis subject and a analysis assistant. In the primary two focus teams, the outcomes of the earlier interviews have been revealed and the individuals requested to debate the boundaries and implementation mechanisms of common well being insurance policies (elicited from the context of the interviews). In the third focus group, individuals have been requested to price the significance of every proposed barrier and mechanism from one to 10 on a Likert scale (8). The objective of this third focus group was to rank the examine outcomes utilizing RAND appropriateness (9) with regard to boundaries and mechanisms consensus.
To guarantee reliability throughout the examine, face-to-face involvement with individuals prolonged over lengthy durations, with repeated periods and suggestions acquired from individuals so as to reduce inaccuracies and keep the trustworthiness of the examine assured by individuals’ affirmation, consensus conferences and associated proof.
Results
A complete of 32 well being system top-level managers and planners have been interviewed nose to nose. More than 90% of individuals have been male with PhD levels, half have been within the age vary of fifty to 60 years outdated, and 37% and 50% held the place of president/deputy of medical sciences universities or heads/deputies of well being analysis facilities, respectively. The remaining individuals have been chiefs or deputies of hospitals (Table 1).
During the interviews, all feedback regarding mechanisms and boundaries have been collected and have been recognized on the stage of well being system policy-making and administration. Majority of mechanisms have been associated to the event of well being infrastructures (together with household practitioner, referral system, medical insurance system, digital well being data, and so on.) in addition to acceptable allocation of sources throughout the well being system (together with consideration to the wants of the well being sector, focused subsidies to advertise well being, and improvement monetary controllers). When discussing a profitable mannequin for the Primary Health Care (PHC) community within the Islamic Republic of Iran, individuals emphasised that institution of well being infrastructures can result in main enhancements in public well being indicators. Furthermore, many individuals acknowledged that having correct and focused allocation of sources throughout the well being system is crucial to satisfy nationwide well being wants and higher achievement of common well being insurance policies. For instance; relating to the household doctor and referral system, one of many interviewees acknowledged that:
“Proper implementation of a household doctor plan facilitates entry to an efficient and environment friendly referral system and results in the conclusion of many paragraphs inside common well being insurance policies. For occasion, in Paragraph 5 of the final well being insurance policies we are able to see the group of calls for, and even in Paragraphs 2–5 we are able to see the promotion of well being indicators to the primary rating within the area. All of those require a complete nationwide plan for the event of a elementary programme … due to this fact, for my part, the implementation of a household doctor plan is the cornerstone of the final well being insurance policies.”
In phrases of consideration to common well being insurance policies within the formulation strategy of the nation’s five-year financial, social and cultural plans; one interviewee famous that:
“I’ve famous the final well being insurance policies doc as one which determines to an ideal extent the dominant issue of actions within the well being sector. To meet these targets, we want correct and long-term planning … we now have had five-year financial, social, and cultural improvement plans for a number of many years in our nation; nevertheless, we now have missed well being improvement and even there isn’t a hint of well being in naming improvement programmes. Our improvement plans needs to be one for financial, social, cultural, and well being improvement. In my view, the final well being insurance policies shouldn’t have an appropriate place in Iran’s improvement plans.”
Another interviewee identified the significance of conducting utilized analysis to satisfy nationwide wants within the well being sector as follows:
“Under the present situations the place our nation is going through issues by way of imports of medicines and medical gear, conducting utilized analysis to cope with nationwide wants has been doubled. Our consultants and scientists have made broad progress on this subject, which has led to the manufacturing of medicines within the remedy of quite a lot of incurable ailments reminiscent of hepatitis, a number of sclerosis, Alzheimer’s and most cancers; thus, the nation doesn’t must import a few of these drugs anymore. Therefore, for my part, focused allocation of sources for conducting utilized analysis can help common well being insurance policies and a resistant economic system.”
Also by way of the numerous position of digital well being data, one interviewee commented that:
In addition, one interviewee raised the next points by way of altering the position of the medical insurance system:
“The difficulty of prevention earlier than remedy is the initially paragraph within the common well being insurance policies. In my opinion, insurance coverage firms needs to be the catalyst for adjustments in attitudes. Currently, insurance coverage companies in our nation insure the sickness and remedy however not the well being and prevention. Prevention companies and screenings shouldn’t have anywhere in our insurance coverage packages. Most of these insured aren’t inspired to take prevention actions reminiscent of weight management, blood stress and so forth. Lots of essential ailments are recognized and handled within the ultimate stage, which is normally pricey and ineffective … insurance coverage firms ought to establish financial measures for cost-effective prevention and screening and make them obligatory for these teams in danger.”
The outcomes of the consensus conferences to price the implementation mechanisms, primarily based on a Likert scale (0–10), are illustrated in Table 2.
Barriers to implementing common well being insurance policies have been elicited from particular person interviews and focus teams in addition to the outcomes of rating boundaries in consensus conferences (Table 3). The most essential boundaries to the implementation of common well being insurance policies have been lack of formulated methods, poor administration, lack of a complete nationwide motion plan, minimal info infrastructures, and insufficient funding. Most of the interviewees argued that no particular and stuck methods have been decided for the conclusion of common well being insurance policies and at any time when senior administration throughout the well being system adjustments, totally different methods are then established and adopted. In this context, one of many interviewees reiterated that:
“Unfortunately, reforms weren’t items of a puzzle to unravel an issue … every authorities tries out their very own procedures to satisfy the targets whereas the processes carried out by former governments remained unfinished. One authorities pays consideration to the problem of household doctor programmes, whereas the subsequent authorities places well being sector evolution plans on the centre of consideration.”
Moreover, some interviewees believed there aren’t acceptable info infrastructures and financing for realization of common well being insurance policies. Regarding info for decision-making, one interviewee acknowledged that, “Most of our choices are made primarily based on speculations and guesswork, not primarily based on dependable information and proof … generally we’re not even capable of display or observe the outcomes of our enforced coverage.” In addition, by way of financing well being methods, a lot of the interviewees pointed to points reminiscent of instability in financing the well being sector evolution plan (HSEP), adjustments in revenue and the annual authorities funds, in addition to the health-care sector’s share of GDP.
According to findings, common well being insurance policies may not essentially be accepted or tried by policy-makers attributable to conflicts of pursuits amongst sure stakeholders. For instance, one of many interviewees with medical specialism clearly expressed opposition to the promotion of conventional drugs, stating that, “Today, some declare that they’ll heal bedsores by conventional drugs. However, as a surgeon I reject this difficulty. I even had sufferers utilizing conventional strategies who have been referred to me with extreme situations. Traditional drugs has been abused and has turn out to be an excuse for fraud.”
Discussion
This examine was carried out instantly after notification of the nation’s common well being insurance policies by the Supreme Leader. According to the outcomes, organizing the referral system by the Family Physician Programme was the initially mechanism for profitable implementation of common well being insurance policies within the Islamic Republic of Iran. The availability capability of household physicians for creating the nation’s referral well being system has already been talked about in earlier research (19,20). Although the Family Physician Programme has been termed the second well being reform revolution (3), there’s nonetheless not adequate effort made to implement it throughout the nation. Despite the numerous and constructive results of the Family Physician Programme on well being indicators (21), the programme continues to be removed from supreme in the case of common protection. Policy-makers must develop the Family Physician Programme as one of the crucial essential mechanisms for realizing Iranian macro-health insurance policies.
Lack of agreed well being policy-making and planning has all the time been one of the crucial essential challenges for the Iranian well being system (22). According to our examine outcomes, consideration to common well being insurance policies in formulation processes of five-year improvement plans is critical for the profitable implementation of common well being insurance policies. The nation’s 5-year improvement plans (5YDP) are strategic and operational plans designed at nationwide stage for managing the nation’s financial, social and cultural improvement. Five improvement plans have been ready and carried out since 1979; amongst them the fifth 5YDP is famous for concentrating on the nation’s well being system improvement (11). However, based on our examine outcomes 5YDPs have good capability to visualise and actualize the nation’s common well being insurance policies and to beat present and future well being challenges. However, its implementation wants energetic leaders, succesful managers, motivated technical employees and social mobilization (11).
The difficulty of establishing an environment friendly digital well being document was acknowledged as one of the crucial essential mechanisms for implementing common well being insurance policies. However, lack of vital info infrastructures for evidence-based decision-making was elicited as one of the crucial essential boundaries to implementing common well being insurance policies. In this regard, Mehrdad (23) in his examine acknowledged that the dearth of built-in well being info methods within the Iranian well being sector limits the potential for well being methods efficiency evaluation. In addition, Larijani et al. (22) emphasised the necessity for extra consideration given to an evidence-based policy-making course of in Iran well being system, but information base infrastructures are nonetheless not fully operational within the nation. This was clearly seen within the transcribed interviews within the current examine. However, it needs to be famous that previously few years MoHME has made nice progress in digital well being document creation, notably in out-patient companies (24).
Inadequate and unstable financing within the well being system is one other barrier to profitable implementation of common well being insurance policies. These embrace restricted and unsustainability of monetary sources and an imbalance between sources and anticipated companies (11,25). Such monetary points make it troublesome to outline healthcare goals for well being reforms (26) and plenty of well being reforms have begun to falter attributable to an absence of sustainable financing. The most up-to-date instance was the Health Sector Evolution Plan (HSEP) (27), which acquired intensive response in official and social media, however considerations raised in regards to the financial burden of the programme on public funds meant it was seen as unviable.
In such conditions a rigorous financial evaluation of the priorities and trade-offs inherent within the system would assist well being policy-makers to confront monetary challenges and to attain their desired goals extra successfully (26). Unfortunately the dearth of prioritization for health-care reforms on the nationwide stage was recognized as one of many main boundaries to the implementation of the final well being insurance policies. Asadi et al. (28) talked about of their examine the achievements of the first well being care (PHC) system within the Islamic Republic of Iran and regarded wants evaluation and prioritization of well being reforms important for the advance of PHC efficiency. Similarly, the World Bank additionally acknowledged the Iranian PHC system and argued that its efficiency needs to be prioritized primarily based on new wants analyses so as to make structural reforms. This could be required for upcoming well being wants and priorities within the nation, together with adjustments within the patterns of illness and an ageing inhabitants (29). The newest HSEP has invested new monetary sources in therapeutic and hospital companies; nevertheless, some consultants believed that any reforms needs to be began by PHC and the preventative drugs sector. Although many efforts have been made to develop PHC as a part of HSEP, the plan has nonetheless been criticized for not contemplating the primacy of PHC and preventive programmes (27,30).
Finally, the problems raised by the interviewees and the empirical proof cited recommend that common well being insurance policies may not be essentially accepted and tried by policy-makers attributable to battle of pursuits amongst sure stakeholders, which was additionally emphasised by the Health Policy Council of MoHME (11). Policy-making, pricing, provision and monitoring are performed by medical medical doctors concurrently within the nation’s well being system, which may create battle of pursuits for policy-making and drastically hurt the precept of impartiality. Ellen et al. (31) acknowledged battle of pursuits as a common cause for damaging attitudes and resistance to alter and recognized it as crucial barrier to evidence-based decision-making in Canada’s well being system. Likewise, findings by Wye et al. (32) point out that many well being policy-makers within the British well being system are involved about their private pursuits and advantages. Therefore, consideration to policy-makers’ priorities and improvement of mutual pursuits stay influential for profitable implementation of well being insurance policies and plans.
Limitations
The first limitation to this examine was that because of the growth of common well being insurance policies, most of the paragraphs remained with none remark. Future research ought to categorize common well being insurance policies and have an in depth paragraph by paragraph evaluate. The second limitation was the choice of interviewees solely from the Iranian health-care system of Iran, since common well being insurance policies deal with all organizations and methods related to well being. Finally, we want to re-emphasize that this examine solely highlights quite a lot of crucial boundaries and mechanisms vital for profitable implementation of the final well being insurance policies; additional research might establish nonetheless extra boundaries and mechanisms.
Conclusion
The common well being insurance policies have created an ideal capability for quantitative and qualitative well being promotion within the Islamic Republic of Iran. Correct implementation may result in a revolution in well being companies in Iranian society, which itself generally is a mannequin for well being promotion in low-income international locations. A greater understanding of boundaries and mechanisms to the profitable implementation of common well being insurance policies would supply the mandatory background to help the present potential for well being promotion. Finally, we advise that the appliance of common well being insurance policies should be evaluated by well being policy-makers each 5 years a minimum of.
Acknowledgements:
We want to categorical our gratitude to all those that assisted us throughout the course of this analysis.
Funding: None.
Competing pursuits: None declared.
Mise en œuvre réussie des politiques générales de santé en République islamique d’Iran : mécanismes et barrières
Résumé
Contexte : Les politiques générales de santé de la République islamique d’Iran ont été approuvées en avril 2014 .
Objectif : La présente étude a examiné les barrières auxquelles se heurtent actuellement les politiques générales de santé, ainsi que les mécanismes requis pour assurer le succès de leur mise en œuvre.
Méthodes : Il s’agissait d’une étude qualitative menée dans le cadre d’un projet en deux phases reposant sur les directives CAN-IMPLEMENT©. Un ensemble de méthodes qualitatives, incluant des entretiens approfondis en face-à-face, des groupes de dialogue et des réunions de consensus, ont été utilisées afin de déterminer les mécanismes et les barrières à ce sujet.
Résultats : Vingt et un mécanismes et treize barrières ont été identifiés. Dans leur majorité, les mécanismes étaient liés à la mise en place d’infrastructures de santé et à une allocation adéquate des ressources. Les barrières les plus significatives à la mise en œuvre des politiques générales de santé étaient un manque de stratégies efficaces, une mauvaise gestion, l’absence de plan d’motion nationwide complet, des infrastructures d’info limitées, et un financement insuffisant.
Conclusion : Une compréhension approfondie des barrières et des mécanismes pour la mise en œuvre des politiques générales de santé peut fournir le contexte nécessaire afin d’assurer une promotion de la santé réussie dans le pays.
آليات التنفيذ الناجح للسياسات الصحية العامة في جمهورية إيران الإسلامية والعوائق أمام ذلك
محمد مسكربور-أميري، علي مهرابي-توانا
الخلاصة
الخلفية: أقر المرشد الأعلى الإيراني، في أبريل/نيسان 2014، السياسات الصحية العامة لجمهورية إيران الإسلامية، التي تهدف إلى تعزيز النُظُم الصحية في القطر.
الأهداف: تهدف هذه الدراسة البحثية إلى تحديد وفحص آليات التنفيذ الناجح للسياسات الصحية العامة والعوائق التي قد تقف أمام ذلك.
طرق البحث: أجريت هذه الدراسة النوعية في شكل مشروع يُنفَّذ على مرحلتين ويرتكز على المعايير القياسية الممكنة التنفيذ. واشتملت على مجموعة من الأساليب النوعية، من بينها مقابلات متعمقة تمت وجهاً لوجه، ومجموعات بؤرية، واجتماعات شخصية توافقية من أجل توضيح آليات التنفيذ الناجح للسياسات الصحية العامة والعوائق التي قد تقف أمام ذلك.
النتائج: تم إقرار واحد وعشرين آلية للتنفيذ الناجح للسياسات الصحية العامة، وثلاثة عشر عائقاً قد يقف أمام ذلك. وكان معظم الآليات متعلقاً بتطوير البنية الصحية الأساسية وتخصيص الموارد على نحو كاف. ويتمثل أهم العوائق التي قد تقف أمام تنفيد هذه السياسات، في غياب الاستراتيجيات المنظّمة، وعدم التوافق في الأساليب الإدارية، وعدم وجود خطة عمل وطنية شاملة، ونقص قنوات المعلومات، والتمويل غير الكافي.
الاستنتاجات: إن وجود فهم أعمق لآليات التنفيذ الناجح للسياسات الصحية العامة، وللعوائق التي قد تقف أمام ذلك، من شأنه أن يوفر المعلومات الأساسية الضرورية التي تُفضي إلى إمكانية تعزيز السياسات الصحية في جمهورية إيران الإسلامية.
References
Shadpour Okay. Primary well being care networks within the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2000 Jul;6(4):822–5. PMID:11794090
Heshmati B, Joulaei H. Iran’s health-care system in transition. Lancet. 2016 Jan 2;387(10013):29–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01297-0 PMID:26766344
Takian A, Rashidian A, Kabir MJ. Expediency and coincidence in re-engineering a well being system: an interpretive strategy to formation of household drugs in Iran. Health Policy Plan. 2011 Mar;26(2):163–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czq036 PMID:20732859
Takian A, Doshmangir L, Rashidian A. Implementing household doctor programme in rural Iran: exploring the position of an current main well being care community. Fam Pract. 2013 Oct;30(5):551–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmt025 PMID:23788202
Esmaeili R, Hadian M, Rashidian A, Shariati M, Ghaderi H. Family drugs in Iran: going through the well being system challenges. Glob J Health Sci. 2014 11 30;7(3):260–6. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n3p260 PMID:25948450
Moradi-Lakeh M, Vosoogh-Moghaddam A. Health sector evolution plan in Iran; fairness and sustainability considerations. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 08 31;4(10):637–40. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.160 PMID:26673172
Piroozi B, Rashidian A, Moradi G, Takian A, Ghasri H, Ghadimi T. Out-of-Pocket and Informal Payment Before and After the Health Transformation Plan in Iran: Evidence from Hospitals Located in Kurdistan, Iran. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 02 11;6(10):573–86. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.16 PMID:28949473
Hashemi B, Baratloo A, Forouzafar MM, Motamedi M, Tarkhorani M. Patient satisfaction earlier than and after executing well being sector evolution plan. Iranian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2015;2(3):127–33.
Meskarpour-Amiri M, Assari-Arani A, Sadeghi H, Agheli-Kohnehshahri L. Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Informal Payments within the Health Sector. Transylv Rev Adm Sci. 2016;12(47):116–28. https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/475.
Marandi SA. The Health Landscape of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Medical Journal of Islamic World Academy of Sciences. 2016;24(2):56–64.
Vosoogh Moghaddam A, Damari B, Alikhani S, Salarianzedeh M, Rostamigooran N, Delavari A, et al. Health within the fifth 5-years Development Plan of Iran: primary challenges, common insurance policies and methods. Iran J Public Health. 2013 01 1;42(1) Supple1:42–9. PMID:23865015
Tavana AM, Amiri MM. New view on well being insurance policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Health system reform. Ann Trop Med Public Health. 2017;10:767–8. 10.4103/1755-6783.188524
Harrison MB, Graham ID, van den Hoek J, Dogherty EJ, Carley ME, Angus V. Guideline adaptation and implementation planning: a potential observational examine. Implement Sci. 2013 05 8;8(1):49. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-49 PMID:23656884
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic evaluation in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Iravani M, Janghorbani M, Zarean E, Bahrami M. Barriers to Implementing Evidence-Based Intrapartum Care: A Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016 01 1;18(2):e21471. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.21471 PMID:27175303
Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud P-AC, et al. Why don’t physicians observe medical follow tips? A framework for enchancment. JAMA. 1999 Oct 20;282(15):1458–65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.15.1458 PMID:10535437
Vander Putten J, Nolen AL. Comparing outcomes from fixed comparative and laptop software program strategies: A mirrored image about qualitative information evaluation. J Ethnogr Qual Res. 2010;5(1):99–112. 10.2139/ssrn.1752577
Boeije H. A purposeful strategy to the fixed comparative technique within the evaluation of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant. 2002;36(4):391–409. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020909529486
Yazdani S, Akbari Lakeh M. Which Health Cares Are Related to the Family Physician? A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Literature. Iran J Public Health. 2017 May;46(5):585–90. PMID:28560187
Khayatzadeh-Mahani A, Takian A. Family doctor program in Iran: issues for adapting the coverage in city settings. Archives of Iranian drugs. 2014;17(11):776-8. DOI: 0141711/AIM.0012
Naderimagham S, Jamshidi H, Khajavi A, Pishgar F, Ardam A, Larijani B, et al. Impact of rural household doctor program on youngster mortality charges in Iran: a time-series examine. Popul Health Metr. 2017 06 2;15(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-017-0138-0 PMID:28576122
Larijani B, Delavari A, Damari B, Moghadam AV, Majdzadeh R. Health coverage making system in Islamic Republic of Iran: evaluate an expertise. Iran J Public Health. 2009;38 Suppl. 1:1–3.
Mehrdad R. Health system in Iran. Japan Med Assoc J. 2009;52(1):69–73.
Ahmadi M, Foozonkhah S, Shahmoradi L, Mahmodabadi AD. Messaging customary necessities for digital well being data in Islamic Republic of Iran: a Delphi examine. East Mediterr Health J. 2016 02 1;22(11):794–801. https://doi.org/10.26719/2016.22.11.794 PMID:28177109
Lankarani KB, Alavian SM, Peymani P. Health within the Islamic Republic of Iran, challenges and progresses. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2013 Feb;27(1):42–9. [MJIRI] PMID:23479501
Davari M, Haycox A, Walley T. Health care financing in iran; is privatization resolution? Iran J Public Health. 2012;41(7):14–23. PMID:23113205
Moradi-Lakeh M, Vosoogh-Moghaddam A. Health Sector Evolution Plan in Iran; fairness and sustainability considerations. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 08 31;4(10):637–40. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.160 PMID:26673172
Asadi-Lari M, Sayyari AA, Akbari ME, Gray D. Public well being enchancment in Iran–classes from the final 20 years. Public Health. 2004 Sep;118(6):395–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2004.05.011 PMID:15313592
Gressani D, Saba J, Fetini H, Rutkowski M, Maeda A, Langenbrunner J. Islamic Republic of Iran well being sector evaluate: primary report. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2008 39970 – IR Contract No.: 39970 – IR.
Piroozi B, Moradi G, Nouri B, Mohamadi Bolbanabad A, Safari H. Catastrophic well being expenditure after the implementation of well being sector evolution plan: a case examine within the west of Iran. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 03 14;5(7):417–23. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.31 PMID:27694669
Ellen ME, Léon G, Bouchard G, Ouimet M, Grimshaw JM, Lavis JN. Barriers, facilitators and views about subsequent steps to implementing helps for evidence-informed decision-making in well being methods: a qualitative examine. Implement Sci. 2014 12 5;9(1):179–91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0179-8 PMID:25476735
Wye L, Brangan E, Cameron A, Gabbay J, Klein JH, Pope C. Evidence primarily based coverage making and the ‘artwork’ of commissioning – how English healthcare commissioners entry and use info and educational analysis in ‘actual life’ decision-making: an empirical qualitative examine. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 09 29;15(1):430–42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1091-x PMID:26416368