TEHRAN – Human rights have turn into a instrument utilized by Western nations, and fact-finding commissions goal to amplify detrimental narratives about Iran.
The United Nations just lately launched a report on the Iranian rebellion in 2022, sparking intense controversy.
The Iranian High Council for Human Rights shortly rejected the allegations made within the report, dismissing them as baseless and politically motivated.
The report, which is claimed to be the results of a United Nations fact-finding mission, exhibits that Iran has dedicated severe crimes, together with homicide, imprisonment, torture, rape and different types of sexual violence, amid unrest fueled by international influences. condemned the gross violations.
In response, the Iranian High Council for Human Rights vehemently rejected the report, calling it unreliable, unlawful, and biased.
The council claimed that the so-called fact-finding committee had produced a doc that lacked supporting proof, was biased and politically motivated.
According to the council’s assertion, the report lacks authorized foundation, was compiled in an unprofessional method and depends on unverifiable claims, all of which conveniently align with the pursuits of some Western powers. It is claimed that there’s
The Council deplored the rising tendency by Western nations to politicize human rights, which it characterised as a harmful escalation. The assertion accused these nations of manipulating human rights mechanisms to additional their geopolitical targets whereas concealing their true motives.
The Council warned that such actions not solely endanger the integrity of human rights, but in addition undermine confidence in worldwide mechanisms designed to guard human rights.
The Council additionally highlighted the doubtful origins of the Fact-Finding Mission, attributing its institution to lobbying and political maneuvering by Western nations.
He singled out the German authorities as a goal of explicit criticism, recalling its previous involvement in arming Saddam Hussein’s regime with chemical weapons, which brought about untold human struggling to the Iranian folks.
In essence, the Iranian High Council for Human Rights portrays the UN report as a manifestation of a geopolitical maneuver orchestrated by Western nations, which have a historical past of exploiting human rights points to advance their very own agendas. did.
Revealing errors within the UN report
In latest years, the work of fact-finding commissions has highlighted the clear drawback of targeted and selective consideration to human rights violations, significantly with respect to Iran.
Although Iran is addressing a number of challenges throughout totally different elements of society, these commissions primarily give attention to ladies’s points and paint an incomplete image of the nation’s human rights scenario.
But this short-sighted view isn’t just an oversight, however a calculated ploy by Western powers to make use of human rights as a political bludgeon towards Iran.
The obvious variations within the fee’s method turn into much more obvious when juxtaposed with its notable silence on the plight of Palestinian ladies.
A melting pot of struggling, the Gaza Strip has been the location of a relentless Israeli invasion that has resulted within the deaths of roughly 30,000 Palestinians. However, the fee selected to show a blind eye to this humanitarian disaster and ignore the horrible conflict crimes dedicated by the Israeli army.
The complete siege of the enclave, coupled with widespread starvation and the tragic deaths of Palestinian youngsters, highlights a dire scenario of systematic oppression and disrespect for human dignity.
This raises pertinent questions concerning the Commission’s dedication to humanitarian ideas. If its mandate really extends to the safety of human rights on a world scale, why has it failed to handle the continued atrocities in Palestine? What concrete steps have you ever taken to carry Israel accountable for its severe violations of worldwide regulation?
Iran has chosen to handle its home challenges by its personal framework. The Iranian authorities acknowledges that, within the eyes of Western powers, human rights debates are sometimes used as a pretext to exert stress and advance geopolitical agendas.
It is obvious that the selective invocation of human rights by Western states displays a broader sample of geopolitical opportunism. When Western pursuits align, human rights turn into a cry for intervention and sanctions. But when such curiosity doesn’t exist, there’s a deafening silence.
This obvious double customary highlights the necessity for a extra nuanced and principled method to human rights safety. It transcends geopolitical challenges and prioritizes the common dignity and well-being of all people, no matter nationality or political affiliation.