Tuesday, January 20, 2026
HomeHealthSurvival, mortality, and epidemic danger standing of the novel coronavirus illness (COVID-19):...

Survival, mortality, and epidemic danger standing of the novel coronavirus illness (COVID-19): a population-based examine in Golestan Province, Iran | Public Health Archives


Study design and individuals

This retrospective examine included 85,885 sufferers registered within the National Medical Monitoring Center (MCMC) system and admitted to Golestan Medical University Affiliated Hospitals, Iran from February 20, 2020 to December 19, 2022. Ta.

The MCMC system is operated by the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education and is operational in all medical science universities as probably the most full system for registering outpatients and inpatients with COVID-19. The system data affected person data, together with private traits comparable to age, gender, place of residence, remedy employees standing, historical past of underlying illness, indicators and signs, illness end result, and date of onset. Patients registered on this system embody particular instances (optimistic polymerase chain response take a look at or lung computed tomography scan) or possible instances (clinically recognized by a doctor).

After extracting knowledge for the survey interval (85,855 folks), we narrowed down the info to exclude outpatients. We additionally excluded hospitalized sufferers with out discharge/dying dates, sufferers with lacking private knowledge, and sufferers transferred to different medical facilities excluded from Golestan Medical University’s protection. Ultimately, knowledge from 68,983 people have been analyzed (Figure 1).

Figure 1Figure 1

Flowchart of the sampling course of for hospitalized sufferers with COVID-19 in Golestan province

affected person survival time

Based on the admission date, the date of dying (dying date) or discharge date (censored) was calculated in days. In this examine, survival was measured and recorded because the affected person’s size of keep within the hospital, i.e. the time from the beginning of hospitalization to discharge (size of keep) or time of dying.

Epidemic danger standing (ERS)

The official danger evaluation methodology printed by the Ministry of Health and the National COVID-19 Control Committee was used to find out the ERS. This methodology classifies outbreaks into 4 ERS ranges primarily based on adjusted incidence charges (AIR).

$$AIR=frac{{N}_{P} +{ alpha }( {N}_{N}- {N}_{U}) }{textual content{Pop }*textual content{ t}} *textual content{100,000}$$

({N}_{P}): Number of extreme acute respiratory sickness (SARI) instances hospitalized with a optimistic coronavirus illness (COVID-19) take a look at end result.

({N}_{N}): Number of SARI instances hospitalized with unfavorable COVID-19 take a look at outcomes.

({N}_{U}): Number of hospitalized SARI instances with no coronavirus illness (COVID-19) take a look at outcomes recorded.

(textual content{pop}): Urban inhabitants

t: The size of the goal interval in days.

α: Influence issue for unfavorable or unsure instances. This coefficient is probably going as a result of false-negative chance of the molecular take a look at.

To calculate the chance rating primarily based on AIR, the next method was used:

$$Score={textual content{AIRw}}_{1}+updelta *textual content{Max }( 0, {textual content{AIRw}}_{1}-frac{{textual content{AIRw}}_ {2} +{textual content{AIRw}}_{3}}{2})$$

({textual content{AIRw}}_{1}): Adjusted incidence charge for the previous week.

({textual content{AIRw}}_{2}): Adjusted incidence charge for weeks previous to final week.

({textual content{AIRw}}_{3}): Adjusted incidence charge for the week two weeks earlier than final week.

The above method calculates the rise in AIR during the last week in comparison with the earlier 14 days to find out an growing or reducing pattern in illness incidence. If the pattern is reducing or fixed, solely ({textual content{AIRw}}_{1}) is used. If the pattern is growing, an increment is added to ({textual content{AIRw}}_{1}) to account for the delta issue.

Finally, primarily based on the ERS index, cities are categorised based on the next standards:

Very excessive danger (crimson): ERS rating > 4 and growing pattern

High danger (orange): ERS rating 2-4 or ERS rating > 4 and reducing pattern

Moderate danger (yellow): ERS rating 1-2

Low danger (blue): ERS rating < 1

For every enrolled affected person, the ERS degree on the primary day of admission shall be thought of as the premise for comparability.

Other variables (covariates)

Based on the age classification of COVID-19 deaths recorded by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), people could be categorized into eight age teams: 0-17, 18-29, 30-39, and 40. categorised into teams. –49 years previous, 50-64 years previous, 65-74 years previous, 75-84 years previous, 85 years previous and above [16]. An particular person is taken into account to have an underlying medical situation if they’ve not less than one of many following: coronary heart illness, diabetes, power kidney illness, bronchial asthma or different power lung illness, power neurological issues, hypertension, blood issues, power liver illness, most cancers, or HIV. Then it was categorised. /AIDS, acquired or congenital immunodeficiency, different power ailments, or being pregnant. Otherwise, the individual was categorised as having no underlying illness.

The medical spectrum of COVID-19 has been categorised primarily based on the National Institutes of Health’s COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines [17]:

Moderate illness: Patients with medical or imaging proof of decrease respiratory tract illness and arterial oxygen ranges of 94% or increased.

Severe illness: People with arterial oxygen ranges lower than 94%, respiratory charge larger than 30 breaths/min, and lung opacity larger than 50% on imaging checks who require oxygen remedy.

Serious sickness: People admitted to the intensive care unit or intubated (respiratory failure, septic shock, or a number of organ failure).

statistical evaluation

Findings are reported utilizing frequencies and percentages for all variables. Overall survival was assessed utilizing the Kaplan-Meier methodology and the belief of proportional hazards primarily based on the Schoenfeld scale. We additionally used the log-rank take a look at and univariate and multivariate Cox modeling to judge the comparability of affected person survival in several subgroups and the correlation between ERS and dying/survival. All analyzes have been carried out utilizing SPSS 26 and Stata 17 software program.



Source hyperlink

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Popular