In late February, the Phoenix Project in Iran (PPI), a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit science group, examined Iranian social priorities.
The objective of the research was to collect native analysis on vital social points that Iranians imagine ought to form their nation’s future. The outcomes and evaluation have been revealed.
The preliminary findings from a week-long on-line survey entitled “Understanding Iranian priorities,” which included 33 questions, at the moment are accessible.
A complete of 12,707 individuals accomplished the survey, together with 9,253 from inside Iran. In this research, there’s a 95% confidence issue and the margin of error is ±1.2%.
Women’s participation within the survey was over 32% in comparison with earlier surveys carried out by the identical assume tank.
Most individuals have been younger individuals of their 18 years of age to early 40s, with the second largest group between 50 and 60 years of age. As a consequence, most respondents have been born after the Islamic Revolution in 1979 or have been very younger on the time (underneath the age of 18).
Respondents got here primarily from the provinces of Tehran, Isfahan, Arborz, Holasan Razabi, Fars, Mazandaran, Gilan and Quezestan.
Young lady (R) will put on a scarf moderately than a hijab in Tehran on September 10, 2024.
Regarding their views on the US most strain marketing campaign towards the Islamic Republic, 87% expressed constructive opinions, 8% had destructive opinions, and 5% have been detached. Additionally, 68% stated they imagine the coverage will result in inside modifications in Iran, however 21% have been uncertain, and 11% weren’t positive.
In response to questions concerning the “most acceptable type of authorities” for Iran’s future, virtually 80% of respondents supported the parliamentary monarchy. Around 13% of respondents supported the parliamentary republic, whereas solely 0.34% deemed the Islamic republic essentially the most “acceptable”.
Those who’re unsure or choose different political fashions account for five.36% and a couple of.29% of respondents, respectively. This is a considerably increased share than these defending the Islamic Republic.
Over 67% of respondents stated they imagine the protesters are demanding a change of presidency relating to the explanations behind the continued protests in Iran. Over 23% imagine protests are financial points, whereas 0.15% say they need higher freedom and freedom of selection in clothes, 3.77% assume that they cite “different” causes.
In response to long-standing questions on Iran’s political future, 89.42% of respondents supported Prince Reza Pallavi to steer the interim interval. Nearly 6% expressed help for the chief, 3.99% supported energetic politicians in Iran, and 0.70% supported activists outdoors the nation besides Reza Pahlavi.
A change of presidency is Iran’s solely answer, DC Conference audio system say
Of Iran’s 3.99% politicians, 3.52% help conservatives, 36.04% help reformers, 60.43% help different activists, and those that help the present administration additionally think about transitional concepts.
Furthermore, 96.99% strongly agreed to Iran’s separation of faith from the long run state, with 1.95% barely agreed, 0.29% barely disagreeing, and 0.13% barely disagreeing, whereas 0.73% of these opposed the thought had no opinion.
Regarding the integrity of Iran’s territorial integrity, 97.38% confirmed their perception in it, 0.67% not, 1.95% have been unsure, and fewer respondents supported the separatist view.
Prince Reza Pallavi: “The Iranian state is a substitute for the Islamic Republic.”
The survey additionally examined belief amongst respondents in quite a lot of initiatives and establishments.
The ranges of belief for the varied organizations and initiatives have been as follows:
59.24% of PPI itself;
16.48% of Iran’s “prosperity undertaking” is proposed by the National Union of Democrats of Iran (NUFDI), a corporation representing the Iranian-American neighborhood.
13.88% on Nufdi,
5.89% of the Omid Iranian Hope Project proposed by the corporate, a bunch of patriotic specialists, scientists and researchers with monarchical tendencies within the fields of information and expertise.
“A nonpartisan nonprofit group based in 2002 to symbolize the Iranian-American neighborhood,” 1.75% of the National Council of Iranian Americans (NIAC).
In the ultimate query within the survey, respondents have been requested whether or not they would vote for the Islamic Republic, with 99.66% saying “no” and 0.34% saying “sure.”
File photograph: Tehran University college students maintain placards looking for democracy in Iran. Reuters. /
The scope of the response highlights the widespread participation of a variety of teams, starting from critics and opponents to supporters of the Islamic Republic, their factions, worldwide lobbyists, separatists, and people unclear or skeptical of the integrity of Iran’s territorial entities.
An vital statement is that this various and typically contradictory spectrum (e.g., opponents of supporters vs. Islamic republic or territorial integrity) is in step with particular points, reminiscent of opinions about splendid leaders in transition and the motivation behind protests.
Findings and charts can be found on the PPI web site and on the social media platform of this assume tank.